Does Visualization Work? What the Research Says to Do Instead
The short answer: picturing the outcome doesn't help, and it can hurt. In a 1999 UCLA study, students who spent five minutes a day picturing a good exam grade scored 72.6%, lower than the 77.7% scored by students who did nothing. Students who pictured the process (when, where and how they would study) scored highest, at 80.6%. Rehearse the moment, not the win.
The night before something that matters, you've probably been told to picture it going well.
The room nodding along. You, calm and in control. The applause afterward.
I told clients to visualize success for years. Picture the room, picture it going well, picture yourself calm, confident, done. It's what everyone teaches, and it's what I taught too, before I understood what was actually happening underneath it.
Then I read the research. It doesn't just say picturing the win fails to help.
In at least one study, it made things worse.
Does visualizing success actually work?
It depends on what you picture.
Picturing the outcome (the grade, the promotion, the applause) hasn't held up well. Picturing the process (the specific steps and moments that get you there) has. The clearest evidence comes from a study almost nobody quotes.
What did the UCLA visualization study find?
In 1999, UCLA psychologists Lien Pham and Shelley Taylor worked with 101 first-year students in the week before a midterm.
For five minutes a day, five to seven days in a row, each student did one of four things:
Picture the outcome: seeing the grade posted, feeling proud.
Picture the process: where they'd study, when, and what they'd actually do.
Picture both.
Nothing beyond tracking their study hours.
Exam scores:
Picturing the process: 80.6%
Doing nothing: 77.7%
Picturing the outcome: 72.6%
The students who pictured the good grade scored lower than the students who didn't visualize at all.
They also studied less. About 11.6 hours, against 16.1 for the process group and 14.5 for the group who did nothing. (Pham & Taylor, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1999)
What happened to the power pose?
Amy Cuddy's "power pose" TED talk is one of the most-watched in TED's history. Its claim: hold a confident posture for two minutes and your hormones and behavior change.
In 2015, a team led by Eva Ranehill repeated the experiment with 200 people against the original 42. People felt more powerful. Their hormones and behavior didn't measurably change. Dana Carney, one of the original authors, later said publicly she no longer believes the effect is real. (BPS Research Digest)
The problem was never the posture. It's the idea underneath it: picture the outcome, and the outcome becomes more likely.
Why does picturing the outcome backfire?
Gabriele Oettingen has researched this for years. One of her papers with Heather Barry Kappes says it in the title: positive fantasies about an idealized future sap energy. (Kappes & Oettingen, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2011)
It wasn't until my NLP training that I understood why. Visualizing the outcome skips the part that actually changes anything: the steps, the friction, the hard work of getting there.
Here's how I explain it to the women I work with. Picturing the win gives your nervous system a small taste of the reward, with nothing to practice. No cue. No specific moment it can recognize and respond to differently next time.
Picturing the actual moment does the opposite. The specific words. The exact instant you'd normally go quiet. That gives your body something concrete to practice.
What should you visualize before a big meeting instead?
Take the same five minutes the students had. Spend them like the process group did.
Pick the one moment. Not "the meeting." The point where the VP asks, "Any concerns?"
Notice what happens in your body right before you'd normally go quiet. The tight chest. The breath that stops.
Hear yourself say the first sentence. Out loud if you can, even once.
Do it again tomorrow. The study ran for five to seven days, not one.
No applause required.
Not "imagine yourself confident." Rehearse the specific room and the specific sentence until your nervous system has practiced the moment enough times that it stops reading it as a threat.
Frequently asked questions
Does visualization work?
Outcome visualization (picturing the result) does not reliably help and can lower performance. In Pham and Taylor's 1999 UCLA study, students who pictured a good grade scored 72.6%, below the 77.7% of students who did nothing. Process visualization, picturing the specific steps, produced the highest scores at 80.6%.
What is process visualization?
Process visualization means mentally rehearsing the specific actions and moments that lead to a result, such as where and when you will prepare or the exact sentence you will say, rather than picturing the result itself.
How long should I visualize before a presentation or meeting?
The UCLA study used five minutes a day for five to seven days. A practical version is five minutes a day in the week before, rehearsing the one moment you are most likely to go quiet and the first sentence you will say.
Where does your voice go under pressure?
The free Voice Audit is five questions that show you.
Related reading
About Meg Bishton - Meg Bishton is a mindset and leadership coach. She spent 19 years in corporate America as a financial planner before starting her coaching business six years ago, and she works with women whose voice goes quiet in the rooms that matter most.
Comments